From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] bridge: make it possible for packets to traverse the bridge without hitting netfilter Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:34:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20150226.113431.238255529591339000.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1424705163-13428-1-git-send-email-imrep.amz@gmail.com> <20150223160619.GF24297@breakpoint.cc> <54EEF32D.2010202@amazon.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, fw@strlen.de, imrep.amz@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aliguori@amazon.com To: imrep@amazon.de Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54EEF32D.2010202@amazon.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: bridge-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: bridge-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Imre Palik Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:19:25 +0100 > If you are looking for peculiarities in my setup then here they are: > I am on 4k pages, and perf is not working :-( > (I am trying to fix those too, but that is far from being a low hanging fruit.) > So my guess would be that the packet pipeline doesn't fit in the cache/tlb Pure specualtion until you can actually use perf to measure these things. And I don't want to apply patches which were designed based upon pure speculation.