From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] sh_eth changes for net-next Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:34:24 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20150302.153424.1752879269616212723.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1424982665.4444.70.camel@xylophone.i.decadent.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk, nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com, mitsuhiro.kimura.kc@renesas.com, ykaneko0929@gmail.com, yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com To: ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:53564 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753447AbbCBUe1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2015 15:34:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1424982665.4444.70.camel@xylophone.i.decadent.org.uk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ben Hutchings Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 20:31:05 +0000 > Some minor new features and fixes. > > These depend in part on the series I sent earlier for net, specifically > "sh_eth: WARN on access to a register not implemented in a particular > chip" depends on "sh_eth: Fix RX recovery on R-Car in case of RX ring > underrun". Ben, in case it isn't clear, I'm waiting for you to respin your sh_eth bug fix patch series for 'net' based upon the feedback you were given. The longer it takes for you to resubmit a new version of that, the longer this patch series is going to rot in patchwork and I really hate that.