From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 13/14] wireless: Use eth_<foo>_addr instead of
 memset
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 13:57:37 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20150303.135737.630359651880852880.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <cover.1425354527.git.joe@perches.com>
	<0c710456e4875ff00c1a9fcff9378ed15110dcd3.1425354528.git.joe@perches.com>
	<1425370617.2450.3.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: joe@perches.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: johannes@sipsolutions.net
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1425370617.2450.3.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:16:57 +0100

> Other than that, I guess I'll apply this, but I really wish there was a
> way to distinguish more easily which of these require alignment and
> which don't.

You can't apply "this" without the dependency patch #1.

Therefore this should probably all go through my tree.