From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/14] etherdevice: Add eth_<foo>_addr
 CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS code
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:26:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20150303.142601.473683335714577293.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1425388752.5130.164.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
	<1425407104.17273.27.camel@perches.com>
	<1425408125.5130.191.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: joe@perches.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1425408125.5130.191.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:42:05 -0800

> On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 10:25 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> 
>> At least for arm gcc 4.6.3, it emits different code
>> for net/l2tp/l2tp_eth.o
> 
> Then it looks like arm gcc or arm linux memset() should be improved.
> 
> Tracking all memset(x, y, 6) and replace them by some custom version
> seems not very generic to me, when something better can be done.

+1, and none of this stuff is on the fast path anyways.

I think I'll skip this series fornow.