From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] switchdev: support stp updates on stacked netdevices Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 07:37:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20150316063749.GA2032@nanopsycho.orion> References: <20150313.123156.2118585119289960334.davem@davemloft.net> <20150315191722.GE3518@nanopsycho.orion> <20150315.183213.1225773184212277874.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: sfeldma@gmail.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170]:33499 "EHLO mail-wi0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751206AbbCPGhy (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 02:37:54 -0400 Received: by wixw10 with SMTP id w10so24698273wix.0 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 23:37:53 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150315.183213.1225773184212277874.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:32:13PM CET, davem@davemloft.net wrote: >From: Jiri Pirko >Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:17:22 +0100 > >> Does that make sense? I think it is better just pick what we want to >> support now and implement it there. That makes things clearer and >> confusion-prone. > >You can't even say whether it makes sense or not, you yourself >even have to ask. > >Again, I don't want to design our interfaces for potential needs, >I want to design them for actually known needs. > >We'll deal with the discovered exceptions on an as-needed basis, >not from the beginning. Fair enough...