From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: [patch net-next] tc: introduce OpenFlow classifier Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 12:49:38 +0000 Message-ID: <20150327124938.GH12265@casper.infradead.org> References: <1427374439-11587-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> <1427379836.29436.9.camel@stressinduktion.org> <20150326152938.GD2010@nanopsycho.orion> <1427402351.2093330.245738573.1406B9EA@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20150327060716.GB2073@nanopsycho.orion> <20150327114402.GB12265@casper.infradead.org> <20150327122846.GA2172@nanopsycho.orion> <20150327123627.GG12265@casper.infradead.org> <20150327124513.GB2172@nanopsycho.orion> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa , netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, jhs@mojatatu.com, jesse@nicira.com To: Jiri Pirko Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:41090 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752410AbbC0Mtj (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:49:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150327124513.GB2172@nanopsycho.orion> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/27/15 at 01:45pm, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 01:36:27PM CET, tgraf@suug.ch wrote: > >You'll probably end up with a hash as well. I doubt that you > >want to walk through a linear list of matches in the long term. > >Not sure about your plans though. > > Sure, that was supposed next step, to change this to hash list. So at that point you get fairly close to cls_flow in terms of functionality. Not sure why you want to keep them separate.