From: "Peter Nørlund" <pch@ordbogen.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ipv4: add hash-based multipath routing
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 20:54:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150412205430.6d7fcd30@tyr> (raw)
Hi all,
I'm working on adding L3/L4 hash-based IPv4 multipath to the kernel,
but I wonder what the best approach for the mainline kernel is.
When the IPv6 multipath code was added, choosing the routing algorithm
by means of compile-time config or sysctl was rejected, so I assume
that we want to revive the RTA_MP_ALGO or a new attribute?
The IPv6 multipath uses L4 balancing - which is fine for IPv6 where
fragmentation does not happend - but in my opinion the safest default
for IPv4 is L3, especially when multipath is used together with anycast.
My main problem is the existing multipath code which is really old
(linux 2.1.66). From the looks of it, it attempts to be somewhat random,
but in reality it is more or less weighted round-robin, and as far as I
can tell it even has an off-by-one error in its handling of the random
value. I think it is wise to support L3, L4, and per-packet
load-balancing, just like the hardware vendors, but must the per-packet
load-balancing be default, or is it okay to change the default
behavior? Also, would a weighted round-robin with a single per-cpu
counter suffice? This would get rid of the spinlock and avoid causing
cache invalidations of the route info with each packet. But it would not
be true round-robin, which would require a per-route-info counter. If
we are promising round-robin it is bad, but if we are simply promising
weighted per-packet load-balancing, it's a different matter.
Regards,
Peter Nørlund
next reply other threads:[~2015-04-12 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-12 18:54 Peter Nørlund [this message]
2015-04-13 16:34 ` ipv4: add hash-based multipath routing Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150412205430.6d7fcd30@tyr \
--to=pch@ordbogen.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox