From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Cc: sebastian.poehn@gmail.com, Yanjun.Zhu@windriver.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ip_forward: Drop frames with attached skb->sk
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:23:00 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150414.142300.2298282114892493676.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429012487.7346.3.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 04:54:47 -0700
> On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 08:40 +0200, Sebastian Poehn wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 14:33 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
>> > On 04/14/2015 01:52 PM, Sebastian Poehn wrote:
>> > > Initial discussion was:
>> > > [FYI] xfrm: Don't lookup sk_policy for timewait sockets
>> > >
>> > > Forwarded frames should not have a socket attached. Especially
>> > > tw sockets will lead to panics later-on in the stack.
>> > >
>> > > This was observed with TPROXY assigning a tw socket and broken
>> > > policy routing (misconfigured). As a result frame enters
>> > > forwarding path instead of input. We cannot solve this in
>> > > TPROXY as it cannot know that policy routing is broken.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Poehn <sebastian.poehn@gmail.com>
>> > > ---
>> > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_forward.c b/net/ipv4/ip_forward.c
>> > > index 939992c..2fc3b3e 100644
>> > > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_forward.c
>> > > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_forward.c
>> > > @@ -82,6 +82,10 @@ int ip_forward(struct sk_buff *skb)
>> > > if (skb->pkt_type != PACKET_HOST)
>> > > goto drop;
>> > >
>> > > + /* this should happen neither */
>> > Sorry. "neither" should be "either"?
>>
>> /* that should never happen */
>> if (skb->pkt_type != PACKET_HOST)
>> goto drop;
>>
>> /* this should happen neither */
>> if (unlikely(skb->sk))
>> goto drop;
>>
>> Both of them should never happen.
>
> I do not feel the comment is useful in this form.
>
> I would prefer explicit TPROXY reference, maybe using this :
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TPROXY)
> if (skb->sk)
> goto drop;
> #endif
>
> changelog will precisely describes the problem for the curious readers.
I suspect we really want this test unconditionally, because we are not able
to safely operate past this point if skb->sk is NULL regardless of what made
it that way.
At least, I'll sleep more soundly at night :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-14 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-14 5:52 [PATCH] ip_forward: Drop frames with attached skb->sk Sebastian Poehn
2015-04-14 6:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-14 6:18 ` Sebastian Poehn
2015-04-14 16:50 ` David Miller
2015-04-14 6:33 ` yzhu1
2015-04-14 6:40 ` Sebastian Poehn
2015-04-14 11:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-14 18:23 ` David Miller [this message]
2015-04-15 7:32 ` Sebastian Poehn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150414.142300.2298282114892493676.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=Yanjun.Zhu@windriver.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.poehn@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).