From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: micrel: support !CONFIG_HAVE_CLK Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:40:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20150427.134010.660188516721843373.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1430132450-4496-1-git-send-email-niklass@axis.com> <20150427110517.GA10925@localhost> <20150427110807.GB10925@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: niklas.cassel@axis.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, niklass@axis.com To: johan@kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150427110807.GB10925@localhost> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Johan Hovold Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:08:07 +0200 > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 01:05:17PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 01:00:50PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote: >> > Since NULL is a valid clock, we shouldn't use >> > IS_ERR_OR_NULL. >> > >> > Implemented as Russell King suggested in: >> > >> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150207172949.GE8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel >> > --- >> > drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 7 +++++-- >> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c >> > index 1190fd8..d958d13 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c >> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c >> > @@ -522,6 +522,7 @@ static int kszphy_probe(struct phy_device *phydev) >> > struct device_node *np = phydev->dev.of_node; >> > struct kszphy_priv *priv; >> > struct clk *clk; >> > + unsigned long rate = 0; >> > int ret; >> > >> > priv = devm_kzalloc(&phydev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); >> > @@ -548,8 +549,10 @@ static int kszphy_probe(struct phy_device *phydev) >> > } >> > >> > clk = devm_clk_get(&phydev->dev, "rmii-ref"); >> > - if (!IS_ERR(clk)) { >> > - unsigned long rate = clk_get_rate(clk); >> > + if (!IS_ERR(clk)) >> > + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); >> > + >> > + if (rate) { >> >> And how do you expect this to work as clk_get_rate returns -EINVAL when >> clk is NULL? >> >> Have you not tested your patch? > > Nevermind, it is 0 if !CONFIG_HAVE_CLK, but still does not look like the > right fix. Agreed, this doesn't look right to me either.