From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/8] net: dsa: New registration API Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 19:27:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20150430172726.GF18874@lunn.ch> References: <1430359064-23454-1-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20150430131216.GC22831@lunn.ch> <55425D5C.1020101@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, jerome.oufella@savoirfairelinux.com, linux@roeck-us.net, cphealy@gmail.com, mathieu@codeaurora.org, jonasj76@gmail.com, andrey.volkov@nexvision.fr, Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz To: Florian Fainelli Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:44858 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750878AbbD3RcF (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2015 13:32:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55425D5C.1020101@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 09:50:36AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 30/04/15 06:12, Andrew Lunn wrote: > >> Note that there are currenlty no incompatibles changes made to existing Device > >> Tree sources, rather, depending on the bus we are probed for, e.g: MDIO > >> the dsa,mii-bus and dsa,ethernet phandles and first cell of the "reg" property > >> will become obsolete, everything else remains entirely compatible. > > > > Hi Florian > > > > I'm not sure dsa,mii-bus and dsa,ethernet will become obsolete. At > > least they are probably needed for multi switch setups, and the > > possible but probably unlikely multi DSA setups. > > > > You cannot assume that dsa,mii-bus and dsa,ethernet have the same > > parent. In a multi switch setup, it could be there is an mdio-mux in > > the picture. So all your probe really tells you, is that there is a > > switch on this mii bus, but you don't know what ethernet it is hanging > > off. > > Good point. > > > > > The switch could be hanging off multiple ethernets. I'm working on > > supporting this for the WRT1900AC, where i use the bond driver on the > > host side. So dsa,ethernet is a phandle to a bond interface. > > Humm, bond is a software constructs, I thought about this for a while, and came to the conclusion that it is often a software construct, but it can also be a hardware construct, when you have two ethernet interfaces connected to a switch, all on one PCB. So i added a DT binding for bonding. In the case of WRT1900AC, it looks like: bond: bond { compatible = "linux,bond"; slaves = < ð0 >, < ð1 >; }; and then in DSA i have a phandle to this bond interface. This part works great, but i've not posted these patches yet, because it does not work yet because of some other issue. Maybe when i do post this, it will get shot down? Andrew