From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 net-next] net: move qdisc ingress filtering code where it belongs Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 19:59:34 +0200 Message-ID: <20150510175934.GA3799@salvia> References: <1431277170-4618-1-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org> <1431277170-4618-3-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org> <554F9946.9040707@plumgrid.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, jhs@mojatatu.com, daniel@iogearbox.net To: Alexei Starovoitov Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:44420 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751549AbbEJRyy (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2015 13:54:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <554F9946.9040707@plumgrid.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 10:45:42AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On 5/10/15 9:59 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > >The qdisc ingress filtering code is embedded into the core most likely because > >at that time we had no RCU in place to define a hook. This is semantically > >wrong as this violates the most basic rules of encapsulation. > > Yet another attempt to sneak in 'qdisc_ingress_hook' to kill TC ? > Just add another hook for netfilter. Seriously. Enough of these > politics. Absolutely not. I will not kill TC because people like jamal likes it, and that's more than an argument to me to keep it there. I have to ask you to stop harassing me all over with non-technical comments: "evil", "funny", ... I'm getting quite enough of this, you stop that. > Again, Daniel's patch accelerates super-critical ingress path even more. > Care to carefully read it first? No, Daniel is *not* benchmarking the netif_received_core() with no filtering at all.