netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: syncookies: extend validity range
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 23:45:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150514214544.GF6179@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431638816.27831.80.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>

Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> 
> Now we allow storing more request socks per listener, we might
> hit syncookie mode less often and hit following bug in our stack :
> 
> When we send a burst of syncookies, then exit this mode,
> tcp_synq_no_recent_overflow() can return false if the ACK packets coming
> from clients are coming three seconds after the end of syncookie
> episode.

Heh.  Indeed.  This dates back to original from 1997...

> This is a way too strong requirement and conflicts with rest of
> syncookie code which allows ACK to be aged up to 2 minutes.
> 
> Perfectly valid ACK packets are dropped just because clients might be
> in a crowded wifi environment or on another planet.
> 
> So let's fix this, and also change tcp_synq_overflow() to not
> dirty a cache line for every syncookie we send, as we are under attack.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> ---
> As this is an old bug, I chose net-next tree.

Looks great, thanks Eric!

Acked-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-14 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-14 21:26 [PATCH net-next] tcp: syncookies: extend validity range Eric Dumazet
2015-05-14 21:45 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2015-05-15  0:12 ` Yuchung Cheng
2015-05-15  2:33 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150514214544.GF6179@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).