From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] ipv6: fix ECMP route replacement
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 12:12:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <20150515.121212.20831661856896659.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <5554F073.4080501@6wind.com>
	<20150514214907.GA20301@lion>
	<20150515085151.GA32190@unicorn.suse.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru,
	jmorris@namei.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net,
	roopa@cumulusnetworks.com
To: mkubecek@suse.cz
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150515085151.GA32190@unicorn.suse.cz>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 10:51:52 +0200

> But I still rather feel like replacing all existing matching routes
> would better reflect what I expect "replace" to do.

What does IPV4 do?