From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] switchdev: don't abort hardware ipv4 fib offload on failure to program fib entry in hardware Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 16:28:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20150519.162845.955021778058631119.davem@davemloft.net> References: <555AD11E.5040709@cumulusnetworks.com> <20150519.123418.481170679256206928.davem@davemloft.net> <20150519194731.GK9559@gospo.home.greyhouse.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, john.r.fastabend@intel.com, sfeldma@gmail.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: gospo@cumulusnetworks.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:47840 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750993AbbESU2u (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 16:28:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150519194731.GK9559@gospo.home.greyhouse.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Andy Gospodarek Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 15:47:32 -0400 > Are you actually saying that if users complain loudly enough about > the current behavior (not the change Roopa has proposed) that you > would be open to considering a change the current behavior? I am saying that we have a contract with users not to break existing behavior. Full stop.