netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: sfeldma@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jiri@resnulli.us,
	simon.horman@netronome.com, makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rocker: move netevent neigh update to processes context
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 23:29:45 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150521.232945.93773536631316420.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432184707-27252-1-git-send-email-sfeldma@gmail.com>

From: sfeldma@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 22:05:07 -0700

> From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>
> 
> In review of Simon's patchset "rocker: transaction fixes". it was noted
> that rocker->neigh_tbl_next_index was unprotected in the call path below
> and could race with other contexts calling rocker_port_ipv4_neigh():
> 
> 	arp_process()
> 	neigh_update()
> 	rocker_neigh_update()
> 	rocker_port_ipv4_neigh()
> 
> To fix, move the neigh_update() event processing to process contexts and
> hold rtnl_lock to call rocker_port_ipv4_neigh().  This will protect
> rocker->neigh_tbl_next_index accesses and is more consistent with the rest
> of the driver code where non-I/O processing is done under process context
> with rtnl_lock held.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>

Are you sure that the workqueue mechanism all by itself will ensure
that operations queued up will be processed in-order?

I do not know of any such explicit guarantee.

Therefore I think you will need a per-device workqueue with a list,
or something like that.

I could be wrong.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-22  3:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-21  5:05 [PATCH net-next] rocker: move netevent neigh update to processes context sfeldma
2015-05-21  7:37 ` Simon Horman
2015-05-21  8:00 ` Jiri Pirko
2015-05-21  8:53 ` Toshiaki Makita
2015-05-22  3:29 ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150521.232945.93773536631316420.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfeldma@gmail.com \
    --cc=simon.horman@netronome.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).