Re: [net-next PATCH RFC 0/3] Preserve skb->mark through VTI tunnels

Herbert Xu
2015-05-27T07:55:38Z

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 03:41:10PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> These patches are meant to try and address the fact the VTI tunnels are
> currently overwriting the skb->mark value. I am generally happy with the
> first two patches, however the third patch still modifies the skb->mark,
> though it undoes after the fact.
>
> The main problem I am trying to address is the fact that currently if I use
> an v6 over v6 VTI tunnel I cannot receive any traffic on the interface as
> the skb->mark is bleeding through and causing the traffic to be dropped.

Looks good to me. Thanks for following up on this!
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt