netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: sfeldma@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jiri@resnulli.us,
	simon.horman@netronome.com, makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] rocker: move netevent neigh update to processes context
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 23:38:29 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150603.233829.1362177764562847830.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433303008-32656-1-git-send-email-sfeldma@gmail.com>

From: sfeldma@gmail.com
Date: Tue,  2 Jun 2015 20:43:28 -0700

> From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>
> 
> v2:
> 
> Changes based on review:
> 
> - David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> raise problem with system_wq not
>   preserving queue order to execution order.  To fix, use driver-private
>   ordered workqueue to preserve ordering of queued work.
> 
> - Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> small change on kfree of work queue item.
> 
> v1:
> 
> In review of Simon's patchset "rocker: transaction fixes". it was noted
> that rocker->neigh_tbl_next_index was unprotected in the call path below
> and could race with other contexts calling rocker_port_ipv4_neigh():

How it rocker->neigh_tbl_next_index not protected?

rocker->neigh_tbl_lock is _always_ held when it is accessed.

This patch, therefore, looks like completely unnecessary complexity
to me.  Furthermore, I would completely prefer if the operation stays
completely synchronous to the call path where the neigh operation
occurs rather than throwing it out to a workqueue.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-04  6:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-03  3:43 [PATCH net-next v2] rocker: move netevent neigh update to processes context sfeldma
2015-06-04  6:38 ` David Miller [this message]
2015-06-04  8:20   ` Simon Horman
2015-06-04  8:34     ` David Miller
2015-06-04  9:07       ` Simon Horman
2015-06-04 15:34         ` Toshiaki Makita
2015-06-04 18:48           ` David Miller
2015-06-04 16:12     ` Scott Feldman
2015-06-04 22:54       ` Simon Horman
2015-06-05  1:33         ` Scott Feldman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150603.233829.1362177764562847830.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfeldma@gmail.com \
    --cc=simon.horman@netronome.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).