* /net/mpls/conf/ethX//input duplicate entry
@ 2015-06-10 20:43 Scott Feldman
2015-06-10 21:58 ` roopa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Scott Feldman @ 2015-06-10 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Netdev, ebiederm@xmission.com, rshearma, Roopa Prabhu
I'm getting this dump_stack when reloading rocker driver. Did some
sysctl MPLS nodes not get cleaned up on NETDEV_UNREGISTER?
Steps to repro: load rocker (on system) with rocker device, rmmod
rocker, and then modprobe rocker. I doubt this is specific to rocker:
and re-registration of a netdev should hit it. I am using UDEV rules
to rename kernel's ethX to a different name. Maybe that's what
tripped it up?
[ 68.587713] sysctl duplicate entry: /net/mpls/conf/eth4//input
[ 68.590015] CPU: 0 PID: 2944 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 4.1.0-rc7+ #35
[ 68.591514] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org
04/01/2014
[ 68.594401] ffff88000f521f00 ffff88000f73f848 ffffffff81443991
0000000000000006
[ 68.596885] 0000000000000000 ffff88000f73f8a8 ffffffff811a4d5a
ffff88000f73f8b8
[ 68.599328] ffffffff81a9e400 0000000000000000 0000000400000020
ffff88000f73f8c8
[ 68.620961] Call Trace:
[ 68.621770] [<ffffffff81443991>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[ 68.623147] [<ffffffff811a4d5a>] __register_sysctl_table+0x414/0x426
[ 68.624659] [<ffffffff81432c17>] register_net_sysctl+0x10/0x12
[ 68.626052] [<ffffffff81435c85>] mpls_dev_notify+0xd6/0x26f
[ 68.627403] [<ffffffff814297fa>] ? packet_notifier+0x18c/0x19a
[ 68.628821] [<ffffffff81062337>] notifier_call_chain+0x3f/0x6c
[ 68.630225] [<ffffffff8106236d>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x9/0xb
[ 68.631675] [<ffffffff8106237e>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0xf/0x11
[ 68.633146] [<ffffffff8135eb6c>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x4f/0x58
[ 68.634695] [<ffffffff8135ebb6>] call_netdevice_notifiers+0x11/0x13
[ 68.636175] [<ffffffff8136718b>] register_netdevice+0x2f6/0x365
[ 68.637604] [<ffffffff81367214>] register_netdev+0x1a/0x27
[ 68.638962] [<ffffffffa039d3f8>] rocker_probe+0x94d/0xc20 [rocker]
[ 68.640424] [<ffffffff81300001>] ? component_bind_all+0x5b/0x190
[ 68.641861] [<ffffffff812561fa>] local_pci_probe+0x38/0x7e
[ 68.643204] [<ffffffff8125630e>] pci_device_probe+0xce/0xf4
[ 68.644579] [<ffffffff81304312>] driver_probe_device+0xcc/0x23d
[ 68.646220] [<ffffffff81304483>] ? driver_probe_device+0x23d/0x23d
[ 68.647679] [<ffffffff813044d1>] __driver_attach+0x4e/0x6f
[ 68.649051] [<ffffffff813029d0>] bus_for_each_dev+0x5a/0x8c
[ 68.650402] [<ffffffff81303dc2>] driver_attach+0x19/0x1b
[ 68.651773] [<ffffffff81303afd>] bus_add_driver+0xf1/0x1d6
[ 68.653305] [<ffffffff81304c23>] driver_register+0x87/0xbe
[ 68.654652] [<ffffffff81255a74>] __pci_register_driver+0x5d/0x62
[ 68.656087] [<ffffffffa0378000>] ? 0xffffffffa0378000
[ 68.657367] [<ffffffffa0378039>] rocker_module_init+0x39/0x1000 [rocker]
[ 68.658900] [<ffffffffa0378000>] ? 0xffffffffa0378000
[ 68.660178] [<ffffffffa0378000>] ? 0xffffffffa0378000
[ 68.661461] [<ffffffff8100030d>] do_one_initcall+0xe9/0x186
[ 68.662813] [<ffffffff8113d228>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xee/0x100
[ 68.664316] [<ffffffff814418bf>] do_init_module+0x5b/0x1ca
[ 68.665666] [<ffffffff810b2364>] load_module+0x1cf2/0x1ee1
[ 68.667002] [<ffffffff810aefed>] ? __module_get+0x29/0x29
[ 68.668336] [<ffffffff8144a4e7>] ? retint_kernel+0x10/0x10
[ 68.669694] [<ffffffff810b2666>] SyS_init_module+0x113/0x124
[ 68.671062] [<ffffffff81449957>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: /net/mpls/conf/ethX//input duplicate entry
2015-06-10 20:43 /net/mpls/conf/ethX//input duplicate entry Scott Feldman
@ 2015-06-10 21:58 ` roopa
2015-06-10 23:23 ` Scott Feldman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: roopa @ 2015-06-10 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Scott Feldman; +Cc: Netdev, ebiederm@xmission.com, rshearma
On 6/10/15, 1:43 PM, Scott Feldman wrote:
> I'm getting this dump_stack when reloading rocker driver. Did some
> sysctl MPLS nodes not get cleaned up on NETDEV_UNREGISTER?
>
> Steps to repro: load rocker (on system) with rocker device, rmmod
> rocker, and then modprobe rocker. I doubt this is specific to rocker:
> and re-registration of a netdev should hit it. I am using UDEV rules
> to rename kernel's ethX to a different name. Maybe that's what
> tripped it up?
>
On a quick look, wondering if this is because mpls driver does not seem
to do a unregister and re-register sysctl
on device name change.
diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
index 7b3f732..ec21a5d 100644
--- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
+++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
@@ -564,6 +564,14 @@ static int mpls_dev_notify(struct notifier_block
*this, unsigned long event,
case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
mpls_ifdown(dev);
break;
+ case NETDEV_CHANGENAME:
+ mpls_ifdown(dev);
+ if ((dev->type == ARPHRD_ETHER) ||
+ (dev->type == ARPHRD_LOOPBACK)) {
+ mdev = mpls_add_dev(dev);
+ if (IS_ERR(mdev))
+ return notifier_from_errno(PTR_ERR(mdev));
+ }
}
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: /net/mpls/conf/ethX//input duplicate entry
2015-06-10 21:58 ` roopa
@ 2015-06-10 23:23 ` Scott Feldman
2015-06-11 12:55 ` Robert Shearman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Scott Feldman @ 2015-06-10 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: roopa; +Cc: Netdev, ebiederm@xmission.com, rshearma
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:58 PM, roopa <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> On 6/10/15, 1:43 PM, Scott Feldman wrote:
>>
>> I'm getting this dump_stack when reloading rocker driver. Did some
>> sysctl MPLS nodes not get cleaned up on NETDEV_UNREGISTER?
>>
>> Steps to repro: load rocker (on system) with rocker device, rmmod
>> rocker, and then modprobe rocker. I doubt this is specific to rocker:
>> and re-registration of a netdev should hit it. I am using UDEV rules
>> to rename kernel's ethX to a different name. Maybe that's what
>> tripped it up?
>>
> On a quick look, wondering if this is because mpls driver does not seem to
> do a unregister and re-register sysctl
> on device name change.
>
> diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
> index 7b3f732..ec21a5d 100644
> --- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
> +++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
> @@ -564,6 +564,14 @@ static int mpls_dev_notify(struct notifier_block *this,
> unsigned long event,
> case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
> mpls_ifdown(dev);
> break;
> + case NETDEV_CHANGENAME:
> + mpls_ifdown(dev);
> + if ((dev->type == ARPHRD_ETHER) ||
> + (dev->type == ARPHRD_LOOPBACK)) {
> + mdev = mpls_add_dev(dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(mdev))
> + return notifier_from_errno(PTR_ERR(mdev));
> + }
> }
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> }
Roopa, I tested this patch and problem goes away. (It's missing a
break statement, BTW). I didn't look into the correctness of the
patch, but at first glance it seems liek the right thing to do. Maybe
breaking out the renaming portions into sub-functions could keep the
work done in NETDEV_CHANGENAME to a minimum.
Are you sending official fix?
-scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: /net/mpls/conf/ethX//input duplicate entry
2015-06-10 23:23 ` Scott Feldman
@ 2015-06-11 12:55 ` Robert Shearman
2015-06-11 15:04 ` roopa
2015-06-11 18:30 ` /net/mpls/conf/ethX//input duplicate entry Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Robert Shearman @ 2015-06-11 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Scott Feldman, roopa; +Cc: Netdev, ebiederm@xmission.com
On 11/06/15 00:23, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:58 PM, roopa <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>> On 6/10/15, 1:43 PM, Scott Feldman wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm getting this dump_stack when reloading rocker driver. Did some
>>> sysctl MPLS nodes not get cleaned up on NETDEV_UNREGISTER?
>>>
>>> Steps to repro: load rocker (on system) with rocker device, rmmod
>>> rocker, and then modprobe rocker. I doubt this is specific to rocker:
>>> and re-registration of a netdev should hit it. I am using UDEV rules
>>> to rename kernel's ethX to a different name. Maybe that's what
>>> tripped it up?
>>>
>> On a quick look, wondering if this is because mpls driver does not seem to
>> do a unregister and re-register sysctl
>> on device name change.
Mea culpa. Thanks for looking at this.
>>
>> diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>> index 7b3f732..ec21a5d 100644
>> --- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>> +++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>> @@ -564,6 +564,14 @@ static int mpls_dev_notify(struct notifier_block *this,
>> unsigned long event,
>> case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
>> mpls_ifdown(dev);
>> break;
>> + case NETDEV_CHANGENAME:
>> + mpls_ifdown(dev);
>> + if ((dev->type == ARPHRD_ETHER) ||
>> + (dev->type == ARPHRD_LOOPBACK)) {
>> + mdev = mpls_add_dev(dev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(mdev))
>> + return notifier_from_errno(PTR_ERR(mdev));
>> + }
>> }
>> return NOTIFY_OK;
>> }
>
> Roopa, I tested this patch and problem goes away. (It's missing a
> break statement, BTW). I didn't look into the correctness of the
> patch, but at first glance it seems liek the right thing to do. Maybe
> breaking out the renaming portions into sub-functions could keep the
> work done in NETDEV_CHANGENAME to a minimum.
I agree that breaking out the sysctl registration/unregistration is a
good idea to not have to do more work than is necessary, and to avoid
unintended consequences (like routes using the interface being made
unusable).
>
> Are you sending official fix?
Roopa, let me know if you'd like me to carry this forward.
Thanks,
Rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: /net/mpls/conf/ethX//input duplicate entry
2015-06-11 12:55 ` Robert Shearman
@ 2015-06-11 15:04 ` roopa
2015-06-11 18:58 ` [PATCH net] mpls: handle device renames for per-device sysctls Robert Shearman
2015-06-11 18:30 ` /net/mpls/conf/ethX//input duplicate entry Eric W. Biederman
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: roopa @ 2015-06-11 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Shearman; +Cc: Scott Feldman, Netdev, ebiederm@xmission.com
On 6/11/15, 5:55 AM, Robert Shearman wrote:
> On 11/06/15 00:23, Scott Feldman wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:58 PM, roopa <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On 6/10/15, 1:43 PM, Scott Feldman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm getting this dump_stack when reloading rocker driver. Did some
>>>> sysctl MPLS nodes not get cleaned up on NETDEV_UNREGISTER?
>>>>
>>>> Steps to repro: load rocker (on system) with rocker device, rmmod
>>>> rocker, and then modprobe rocker. I doubt this is specific to rocker:
>>>> and re-registration of a netdev should hit it. I am using UDEV rules
>>>> to rename kernel's ethX to a different name. Maybe that's what
>>>> tripped it up?
>>>>
>>> On a quick look, wondering if this is because mpls driver does not
>>> seem to
>>> do a unregister and re-register sysctl
>>> on device name change.
>
> Mea culpa. Thanks for looking at this.
>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>>> index 7b3f732..ec21a5d 100644
>>> --- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>>> +++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>>> @@ -564,6 +564,14 @@ static int mpls_dev_notify(struct
>>> notifier_block *this,
>>> unsigned long event,
>>> case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
>>> mpls_ifdown(dev);
>>> break;
>>> + case NETDEV_CHANGENAME:
>>> + mpls_ifdown(dev);
>>> + if ((dev->type == ARPHRD_ETHER) ||
>>> + (dev->type == ARPHRD_LOOPBACK)) {
>>> + mdev = mpls_add_dev(dev);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(mdev))
>>> + return
>>> notifier_from_errno(PTR_ERR(mdev));
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> return NOTIFY_OK;
>>> }
>>
>> Roopa, I tested this patch and problem goes away. (It's missing a
>> break statement, BTW). I didn't look into the correctness of the
>> patch, but at first glance it seems liek the right thing to do. Maybe
>> breaking out the renaming portions into sub-functions could keep the
>> work done in NETDEV_CHANGENAME to a minimum.
>
> I agree that breaking out the sysctl registration/unregistration is a
> good idea to not have to do more work than is necessary, and to avoid
> unintended consequences (like routes using the interface being made
> unusable).
>
>>
>> Are you sending official fix?
>
> Roopa, let me know if you'd like me to carry this forward.
sorry for the delay in getting back. Its going to be a busy day for me.
And i don't know the side-effects of my changes yet.
you probably have a better handle on this. So if you can, yes please
carry this forward.
thanks!.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: /net/mpls/conf/ethX//input duplicate entry
2015-06-11 12:55 ` Robert Shearman
2015-06-11 15:04 ` roopa
@ 2015-06-11 18:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2015-06-11 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Shearman; +Cc: Scott Feldman, roopa, Netdev
Robert Shearman <rshearma@brocade.com> writes:
> On 11/06/15 00:23, Scott Feldman wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:58 PM, roopa <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>>> On 6/10/15, 1:43 PM, Scott Feldman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm getting this dump_stack when reloading rocker driver. Did some
>>>> sysctl MPLS nodes not get cleaned up on NETDEV_UNREGISTER?
>>>>
>>>> Steps to repro: load rocker (on system) with rocker device, rmmod
>>>> rocker, and then modprobe rocker. I doubt this is specific to rocker:
>>>> and re-registration of a netdev should hit it. I am using UDEV rules
>>>> to rename kernel's ethX to a different name. Maybe that's what
>>>> tripped it up?
>>>>
>>> On a quick look, wondering if this is because mpls driver does not seem to
>>> do a unregister and re-register sysctl
>>> on device name change.
>
> Mea culpa. Thanks for looking at this.
>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>>> index 7b3f732..ec21a5d 100644
>>> --- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>>> +++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
>>> @@ -564,6 +564,14 @@ static int mpls_dev_notify(struct notifier_block *this,
>>> unsigned long event,
>>> case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
>>> mpls_ifdown(dev);
>>> break;
>>> + case NETDEV_CHANGENAME:
>>> + mpls_ifdown(dev);
>>> + if ((dev->type == ARPHRD_ETHER) ||
>>> + (dev->type == ARPHRD_LOOPBACK)) {
>>> + mdev = mpls_add_dev(dev);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(mdev))
>>> + return notifier_from_errno(PTR_ERR(mdev));
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> return NOTIFY_OK;
>>> }
>>
>> Roopa, I tested this patch and problem goes away. (It's missing a
>> break statement, BTW). I didn't look into the correctness of the
>> patch, but at first glance it seems liek the right thing to do. Maybe
>> breaking out the renaming portions into sub-functions could keep the
>> work done in NETDEV_CHANGENAME to a minimum.
>
> I agree that breaking out the sysctl registration/unregistration is a good idea
> to not have to do more work than is necessary, and to avoid unintended
> consequences (like routes using the interface being made unusable).
Yes. It needs to be something like:
+ case NETDEV_CHANGENAME:
+ mdev = mpls_dev_get(dev);
+ if (mdev) {
+ mpls_dev_sysctl_unregister(mdev);
+ mpls_dev_sysctl_register(dev, mdev);
+ }
+ break;
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net] mpls: handle device renames for per-device sysctls
2015-06-11 15:04 ` roopa
@ 2015-06-11 18:58 ` Robert Shearman
2015-06-11 23:48 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Robert Shearman @ 2015-06-11 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: davem, ebiederm, roopa, Scott Feldman, Robert Shearman
If a device is renamed and the original name is subsequently reused
for a new device, the following warning is generated:
sysctl duplicate entry: /net/mpls/conf/veth0//input
CPU: 3 PID: 1379 Comm: ip Not tainted 4.1.0-rc4+ #20
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.7.5-20140531_083030-gandalf 04/01/2014
0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff81566aaf 0000000000000000
ffffffff81236279 ffff88002f7d7f00 0000000000000000 ffff88000db336d8
ffff88000db33698 0000000000000005 ffff88002e046000 ffff8800168c9280
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81566aaf>] ? dump_stack+0x40/0x50
[<ffffffff81236279>] ? __register_sysctl_table+0x289/0x5a0
[<ffffffffa051a24f>] ? mpls_dev_notify+0x1ff/0x300 [mpls_router]
[<ffffffff8108db7f>] ? notifier_call_chain+0x4f/0x70
[<ffffffff81470e72>] ? register_netdevice+0x2b2/0x480
[<ffffffffa0524748>] ? veth_newlink+0x178/0x2d3 [veth]
[<ffffffff8147f84c>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x73c/0x8e0
[<ffffffff8147f27a>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x16a/0x8e0
[<ffffffff81459ff2>] ? __kmalloc_reserve.isra.30+0x32/0x90
[<ffffffff8147ccfd>] ? rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x8d/0x250
[<ffffffff8145b027>] ? __alloc_skb+0x47/0x1f0
[<ffffffff8149badb>] ? __netlink_lookup+0xab/0xe0
[<ffffffff8147cc70>] ? rtnetlink_rcv+0x30/0x30
[<ffffffff8149e7a0>] ? netlink_rcv_skb+0xb0/0xd0
[<ffffffff8147cc64>] ? rtnetlink_rcv+0x24/0x30
[<ffffffff8149df17>] ? netlink_unicast+0x107/0x1a0
[<ffffffff8149e4be>] ? netlink_sendmsg+0x50e/0x630
[<ffffffff8145209c>] ? sock_sendmsg+0x3c/0x50
[<ffffffff81452beb>] ? ___sys_sendmsg+0x27b/0x290
[<ffffffff811bd258>] ? mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x88/0x110
[<ffffffff811bd5b6>] ? mem_cgroup_commit_charge+0x56/0xa0
[<ffffffff811d7700>] ? do_filp_open+0x30/0xa0
[<ffffffff8145336e>] ? __sys_sendmsg+0x3e/0x80
[<ffffffff8156c3f2>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x75
Fix this by unregistering the previous sysctl table (registered for
the path containing the original device name) and re-registering the
table for the path containing the new device name.
Fixes: 37bde79979c3 ("mpls: Per-device enabling of packet input")
Reported-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Shearman <rshearma@brocade.com>
---
net/mpls/af_mpls.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
index bff427f31924..1f93a5978f2a 100644
--- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
+++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
@@ -564,6 +564,17 @@ static int mpls_dev_notify(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event,
case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
mpls_ifdown(dev);
break;
+ case NETDEV_CHANGENAME:
+ mdev = mpls_dev_get(dev);
+ if (mdev) {
+ int err;
+
+ mpls_dev_sysctl_unregister(mdev);
+ err = mpls_dev_sysctl_register(dev, mdev);
+ if (err)
+ return notifier_from_errno(err);
+ }
+ break;
}
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] mpls: handle device renames for per-device sysctls
2015-06-11 18:58 ` [PATCH net] mpls: handle device renames for per-device sysctls Robert Shearman
@ 2015-06-11 23:48 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2015-06-11 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rshearma; +Cc: netdev, ebiederm, roopa, sfeldma
From: Robert Shearman <rshearma@brocade.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 19:58:26 +0100
> If a device is renamed and the original name is subsequently reused
> for a new device, the following warning is generated:
...
> Fix this by unregistering the previous sysctl table (registered for
> the path containing the original device name) and re-registering the
> table for the path containing the new device name.
>
> Fixes: 37bde79979c3 ("mpls: Per-device enabling of packet input")
> Reported-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Shearman <rshearma@brocade.com>
Applied, thanks Robert.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-11 23:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-10 20:43 /net/mpls/conf/ethX//input duplicate entry Scott Feldman
2015-06-10 21:58 ` roopa
2015-06-10 23:23 ` Scott Feldman
2015-06-11 12:55 ` Robert Shearman
2015-06-11 15:04 ` roopa
2015-06-11 18:58 ` [PATCH net] mpls: handle device renames for per-device sysctls Robert Shearman
2015-06-11 23:48 ` David Miller
2015-06-11 18:30 ` /net/mpls/conf/ethX//input duplicate entry Eric W. Biederman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).