From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: mvneta: introduce tx_csum_limit property Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:36:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20150615143601.GM7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1434378443-23029-1-git-send-email-simon.guinot@sequanux.org> <1434378443-23029-2-git-send-email-simon.guinot@sequanux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Gregory Clement , Sebastian Hesselbarth , netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: Simon Guinot Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1434378443-23029-2-git-send-email-simon.guinot@sequanux.org> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 04:27:22PM +0200, Simon Guinot wrote: > This patch introduces the tx_csum_limit DT property. This allows to > configure the maximum frame size for which the Ethernet controller is > able to perform TCP/IP checksumming. If MTU is set to a value greater > than tx_csum_limit, then the features NETIF_F_IP_CSUM and NETIF_F_TSO > are disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Guinot > Cc: # v3.8+ Sorry, I just tripped over this. This looks like a patch adding a new _feature_ to this ethernet driver. It isn't a regression fix, and it isn't a bug fix. Why are you wanting to get it into stable kernels, which are supposed to only have bug and regression fixes applied? -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.