From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
Cc: bernhard.thaler@wvnet.at, pablo@netfilter.org,
stephen@networkplumber.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Unable to unregister netdevice after "netfilter: bridge: forward IPv6 fragmented packets"
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 20:55:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150629185525.GF2324@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55916C5D.3080602@citrix.com>
Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to run the latest Linux tree
> (4a10a91756ef381bced7b88cfb9232f660b92d93) as DOM0 Xen.
> After destroying a guest using network, I got the following
> lines in the DOM0 kernel log:
>
> unregister_netdevice: waiting for vif1.0 to become free. Usage count = 1
>
> The bisector pointed the problem after the commit
> efb6de9b4ba0092b2c55f6a52d16294a8a698edd
> "netfilter: bridge: forward IPv6 fragmented packets".
Seems we can leak skb in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit()... Does this fix the problem?
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
index d89f4fa..1a6fa67 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
@@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
struct brnf_frag_data *data;
if (br_validate_ipv4(skb))
- return NF_DROP;
+ goto drop;
IPCB(skb)->frag_max_size = nf_bridge->frag_max_size;
@@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
struct brnf_frag_data *data;
if (br_validate_ipv6(skb))
- return NF_DROP;
+ goto drop;
IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size = nf_bridge->frag_max_size;
@@ -782,12 +782,16 @@ static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (v6ops)
return v6ops->fragment(sk, skb, br_nf_push_frag_xmit);
- else
- return -EMSGSIZE;
+
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ return -EMSGSIZE;
}
#endif
nf_bridge_info_free(skb);
return br_dev_queue_push_xmit(sk, skb);
+ drop:
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ return 0;
}
/* PF_BRIDGE/POST_ROUTING ********************************************/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-29 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-29 16:03 Unable to unregister netdevice after "netfilter: bridge: forward IPv6 fragmented packets" Julien Grall
2015-06-29 18:55 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2015-06-30 10:33 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150629185525.GF2324@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=bernhard.thaler@wvnet.at \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).