From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v2 1/3] lwt: infrastructure to support light weight tunnels Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:49:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20150703094918.GG26182@pox.localdomain> References: <1434689355-4088-2-git-send-email-roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, rshearma@brocade.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Roopa Prabhu Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:38801 "EHLO mail-wi0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754752AbbGCKLN (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2015 06:11:13 -0400 Received: by wibdq8 with SMTP id dq8so96082314wib.1 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 03:11:12 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1434689355-4088-2-git-send-email-roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/18/15 at 09:49pm, Roopa Prabhu wrote: > +static inline struct lwtunnel_state *lwtunnel_skb_lwstate(struct sk_buff *skb) > +{ > + struct rtable *rt = (struct rtable *)skb_dst(skb); > + > + return rt->rt_lwtstate; > +} Noticed while rebasing onto your patches. This needs an ifdef CONFIG_LWTUNNEL.