From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@savoirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support for VLAN Table Unit
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 16:38:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150708143805.GA32208@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436303900-24259-1-git-send-email-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 05:18:17PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patchset brings full support for hardware VLANs in DSA, and the Marvell
> 88E6xxx compatible switch chips.
Hi Vivien
I would like to do a proper review and testing of these patchset, but
i go on vacation this afternoon. So it will be in about 2 weeks time.
I spent 15 minutes tests just now. I spotted two things:
1) I played with a configuration, and then rebooted the machine. After
login i see:
Debian GNU/Linux comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, to the extent
permitted by applicable law.
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/dsa0/vtu
VID FID SID 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 1 0 u u u u x x t
500 500 0 t t t t x x t
550 550 0 t x x x x x t
# bridge vlan show
port vlan ids
lan0 1 PVID Egress Untagged
lan0 1 PVID Egress Untagged
lan1
lan2
lan3
lan4
lan5
lan6
lan7
lan8 1 PVID Egress Untagged
lan8 1 PVID Egress Untagged
optical3
optical4
br0 1 PVID Egress Untagged
So the switch seems to have some VTU table entries, but the bridge
command does not show them. I suspect that a warm boot does not clear
out the VTU entries in the switch.
Until recently we had a similar problem with the statistics
counters. I wounder if we have the same problem with other tables? Do
static ATU entries get removed on a reboot?
2) I cold booted the machine, to be sure to have a clean state. Then:
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/dsa0/vtu
VID FID SID 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 1 0 u x x x x x t
So a good initial state. I then configure two bridges:
# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br0 8000.92647a2160c4 yes lan0
lan1
br1 8000.92647a2160c4 yes lan2
lan3
and then add vlan 500 to the four interfaces.
# bridge vlan add vid 500 dev lan0 master
# bridge vlan add vid 500 dev lan1 master
# bridge vlan add vid 500 dev lan2 master
# bridge vlan add vid 500 dev lan3 master
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/dsa0/vtu
VID FID SID 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 1 0 u u u u x x t
500 500 0 t t t t x x t
Does this mean we have one hardware bridge? All four ports can talk to
each other? I've not actually sent any frames to test this, so i'm
just speculating. Given that i have two software bridges, this is not
what i would expect, if frames from lan0 or lan1, also went out lan2
or lan3.
Thanks
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-08 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-07 21:18 [PATCH v4 0/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support for VLAN Table Unit Vivien Didelot
2015-07-07 21:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add debugfs interface for VTU Vivien Didelot
2015-07-07 21:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] net: dsa: add support for switchdev VLAN objects Vivien Didelot
2015-07-07 21:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add switchdev VLAN operations Vivien Didelot
2015-07-08 14:38 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2015-07-08 17:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support for VLAN Table Unit Vivien Didelot
2015-07-08 17:32 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-07-08 18:11 ` Vivien Didelot
2015-07-08 20:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-07-08 20:12 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-07-08 20:34 ` Vivien Didelot
2015-07-09 18:01 ` David Miller
2015-07-09 21:03 ` Vivien Didelot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150708143805.GA32208@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kernel@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfeldma@gmail.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).