From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, David <davem@davemloft.net>,
Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel <kernel@savoirfairelinux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support for VLAN Table Unit
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 22:12:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150708201244.GE1357@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1831874541.91682.1436379099609.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com>
> I understand. However this whole VLAN thing represents a lot of code.
> Some other work depends on portions of it. Do you think it'd be OK if I
> resend the patch 1/3 alone? Having only the VTU operations and "vtu"
> debugfs file does not break the actual behavior, and will lighten up the
> following patchsets.
It might be a bit early for that. All the previous versions of 1/3
have had issues with number of ports. I've not had time to take a
close look to see if there are other problems.
If somebody else does a proper review and says its O.K, them i'm
O.K. with that. But until that happens, i don't think it should go in.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-08 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-07 21:18 [PATCH v4 0/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support for VLAN Table Unit Vivien Didelot
2015-07-07 21:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add debugfs interface for VTU Vivien Didelot
2015-07-07 21:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] net: dsa: add support for switchdev VLAN objects Vivien Didelot
2015-07-07 21:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add switchdev VLAN operations Vivien Didelot
2015-07-08 14:38 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support for VLAN Table Unit Andrew Lunn
2015-07-08 17:13 ` Vivien Didelot
2015-07-08 17:32 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-07-08 18:11 ` Vivien Didelot
2015-07-08 20:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-07-08 20:12 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2015-07-08 20:34 ` Vivien Didelot
2015-07-09 18:01 ` David Miller
2015-07-09 21:03 ` Vivien Didelot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150708201244.GE1357@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kernel@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfeldma@gmail.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).