From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: ast@plumgrid.com
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, jhs@mojatatu.com, jiri@resnulli.us,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tc: fix tc actions in case of shared skb
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:34:22 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150714.153422.914759715820927338.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A43B26.1010009@plumgrid.com>
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:26:46 -0700
> On 7/13/15 1:55 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 07/13/2015 10:17 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> ...
>>> We cannot check tc actions from pktgen, since they can be added
>>> dynamically.
>>> So I see three options:
>>> 1 get rid of burst hack for both RX and TX in pktgen (kills
>>> performance)
#1 is a serious consideration if you don't come up with better ideas,
since an optimization is for nothing if it knowingly breaks things.
>>> 2 add unlikely(skb_shread) check to few tc actions
>>> 3 do nothing
> ...
>> pktgen case. :/ With regards to option 2, you could hide that behind
>> a static inline helper wrapped in IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_PKTGEN), but
>> that is a veeeery ugly workaround/hack as well (and distros might
>> even ship it nevertheless).
>
> naming such helper is a headache as well.
> static inline bool is_pktgen_shared_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_PKTGEN)
As mentioned by others, this ifdef accomplishes nothing as indeed
every distribution turns pktgen on so %99.9999 of all users will not
benefit from this optimized check.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-14 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-11 0:10 [PATCH net-next] tc: fix tc actions in case of shared skb Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-12 4:29 ` David Miller
2015-07-13 19:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-13 20:04 ` David Miller
2015-07-13 20:17 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-13 20:55 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-07-13 22:26 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-14 10:29 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-07-14 11:57 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2015-07-14 12:19 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-07-14 15:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-14 22:34 ` David Miller [this message]
2015-07-14 23:08 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-15 0:58 ` John Fastabend
2015-07-15 1:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-07-13 13:13 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150714.153422.914759715820927338.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).