From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
To: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mmap()ed AF_NETLINK: lockdep and sleep-in-atomic warnings
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:38:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150714093825.GC20597@pox.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHA+R7OPHFjL83RKkTmso3s25_f7TKA=HhFKU_yOnRhsn1WxQg@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/13/15 at 10:11pm, Cong Wang wrote:
> Caused by:
>
> commit 21e4902aea80ef35afc00ee8d2abdea4f519b7f7
> Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
> Date: Fri Jan 2 23:00:22 2015 +0100
>
> netlink: Lockless lookup with RCU grace period in socket release
>
> Defers the release of the socket reference using call_rcu() to
> allow using an RCU read-side protected call to rhashtable_lookup()
>
> This restores behaviour and performance gains as previously
> introduced by e341694 ("netlink: Convert netlink_lookup() to use
> RCU protected hash table") without the side effect of severely
> delayed socket destruction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>
>
> We can't hold mutex lock in a rcu callback, perhaps we could
> defer the mmap ring cleanup to a workqueue.
The socket should be dead at this point. It might be simpler to
add a netlink_release_ring() function which doesn't require
locking at all. It would also get rid of all the special handling
for closing vs. non-closing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-14 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-13 13:18 mmap()ed AF_NETLINK: lockdep and sleep-in-atomic warnings Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-07-14 5:11 ` Cong Wang
2015-07-14 9:38 ` Thomas Graf [this message]
2015-07-14 9:50 ` Florian Westphal
2015-07-14 18:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150714093825.GC20597@pox.localdomain \
--to=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=cwang@twopensource.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).