netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mmap()ed AF_NETLINK: lockdep and sleep-in-atomic warnings
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:40:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150714114040.58dd5bf5@urahara> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150714095037.GB25674@breakpoint.cc>

On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:50:37 +0200
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:

> Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> wrote:
> > On 07/13/15 at 10:11pm, Cong Wang wrote:
> > > Caused by:
> > > 
> > > commit 21e4902aea80ef35afc00ee8d2abdea4f519b7f7
> > > Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
> > > Date:   Fri Jan 2 23:00:22 2015 +0100
> > > 
> > >     netlink: Lockless lookup with RCU grace period in socket release
> > > 
> > >     Defers the release of the socket reference using call_rcu() to
> > >     allow using an RCU read-side protected call to rhashtable_lookup()
> > > 
> > >     This restores behaviour and performance gains as previously
> > >     introduced by e341694 ("netlink: Convert netlink_lookup() to use
> > >     RCU protected hash table") without the side effect of severely
> > >     delayed socket destruction.
> > > 
> > >     Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
> > >     Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> > > 
> > > 
> > > We can't hold mutex lock in a rcu callback, perhaps we could
> > > defer the mmap ring cleanup to a workqueue.
> > 
> > The socket should be dead at this point. It might be simpler to
> > add a netlink_release_ring() function which doesn't require
> > locking at all. It would also get rid of all the special handling
> > for closing vs. non-closing.
> 
> Do you know of any users of mmap'd netlink?
> Support for this was never added to libmnl; given the fact that netlink
> mmap doesn't have any advantages vs. socket interface i'd just revert it
> (or mark CONFIG_NETLINK_MMAP broken -- although I don't see
>  how the unconditional copy on tx could ever be avoided).

We use netlink mmap because it gives slightly better performance
when processing a route flap.

      reply	other threads:[~2015-07-14 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-13 13:18 mmap()ed AF_NETLINK: lockdep and sleep-in-atomic warnings Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-07-14  5:11 ` Cong Wang
2015-07-14  9:38   ` Thomas Graf
2015-07-14  9:50     ` Florian Westphal
2015-07-14 18:40       ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150714114040.58dd5bf5@urahara \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=cwang@twopensource.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).