From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Veaceslav Falico Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix destruction of bond with devices different from arphrd_ether Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 08:14:31 +0200 Message-ID: <20150716061431.GA19448@vps.falico.eu> References: <55A69D17.5030800@cumulusnetworks.com> <1436989971-32761-1-git-send-email-razor@blackwall.org> <87io9lcag3.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <55A6E48E.3020206@cumulusnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Nikolay Aleksandrov , netdev@vger.kernel.org, j.vosburgh@gmail.com, gospo@cumulusnetworks.com, clsoto@linux.vnet.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net To: Nikolay Aleksandrov Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com ([209.85.213.176]:33161 "EHLO mail-ig0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751403AbbGPGOf (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:14:35 -0400 Received: by iggp10 with SMTP id p10so6401201igg.0 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 23:14:35 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55A6E48E.3020206@cumulusnetworks.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:54:06AM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: ...snip... >My personal opinion would be to disable non-ethernet devices, but support was >already added and has been there for a long time so we have to fix this for >the older releases, I don't mind removing non-ethernet device support for net-next >but I'm guessing there're people still using that like the case that started >this thread. Yep, last time non-ethernet devices broke there were quite a few reports for ppp users, and infiniband is indeed used a lot too. No options here, we must support it...