From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/3] rhashtable: Add a function for in order insertion and lookup in buckets Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:11:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20150717121157.GE18033@pox.localdomain> References: <1436917549-3666965-1-git-send-email-tom@herbertland.com> <1436917549-3666965-3-git-send-email-tom@herbertland.com> <20150715055411.GA31926@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Linux Kernel Network Developers , Kernel Team To: Tom Herbert Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]:36959 "EHLO mail-wi0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750889AbbGQML7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:11:59 -0400 Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so41071017wib.0 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 05:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/15/15 at 12:46pm, Tom Herbert wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Herbert Xu > > The memory cost is merely 8 bytes per local port, is it really too > > much? > > > Okay, it looks like there is already an additional hlist_node in > skc_common that can be used for a secondary hash. It's conceivable > this can be generalized and used in the TCP listeners also in > combination with rhashtable. Are you dropping this series entirely then?