From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] af_mpls: fix undefined reference to ip6_route_output Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20150722.130314.1100446681284682783.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20150722122309.GB968@pox.localdomain> <20150722.104926.1502608671575195516.davem@davemloft.net> <55AFEF4B.6070702@cumulusnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tgraf@suug.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: roopa@cumulusnetworks.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:44611 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750864AbbGVUDS (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:03:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <55AFEF4B.6070702@cumulusnetworks.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: roopa Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:30:19 -0700 > diff --git a/net/mpls/Kconfig b/net/mpls/Kconfig > index 5c467ef..2b28615 100644 > --- a/net/mpls/Kconfig > +++ b/net/mpls/Kconfig > @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ config NET_MPLS_GSO > > config MPLS_ROUTING > tristate "MPLS: routing support" > + depends on INET > + depends on IPV6 > ---help--- > Add support for forwarding of mpls packets. Having to enable IPV6 in order to use MPLS is not reasonable. You have to seperate out the individual components and give the user a choice in the matter.