From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Fw: [Bug 102051] New: Unexpected TCP behavior
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:02:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150727140218.095729a9@urahara> (raw)
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 20:06:07 +0000
From: "bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org" <bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org>
To: "shemminger@linux-foundation.org" <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [Bug 102051] New: Unexpected TCP behavior
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102051
Bug ID: 102051
Summary: Unexpected TCP behavior
Product: Networking
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 3.19
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: P1
Component: IPV4
Assignee: shemminger@linux-foundation.org
Reporter: vremetic@gmail.com
Regression: No
While running nmap against localhost I started to see open ports in the dynamic
range (>1024). Kind of odd, knowing netstat and ss did not show any listeners
on the port.
With tcpdump, I confirmed system was returning S/ACK for ports that did not
have a listener enabled. The "issue" or feature only occurs if source port
matches the destination port.
# netstat -nap | grep 5000
#
$ nc localhost -p 5000 5000
a
a
# tcpdump -i lo port 5000
14:28:18.059708 IP 127.0.0.1.5000 > 127.0.0.1.5000: Flags [S], seq 2005295207,
win 43690, options [mss 65495,sackOK,TS val 4481790 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length
0
14:28:18.059721 IP 127.0.0.1.5000 > 127.0.0.1.5000: Flags [S.], seq 2005295207,
ack 2005295208, win 43690, options [mss 65495,sackOK,TS val 4481790 ecr
4481790,nop,wscale 7], length 0
14:28:18.059729 IP 127.0.0.1.5000 > 127.0.0.1.5000: Flags [.], ack 2005295208,
win 342, options [nop,nop,TS val 4481790 ecr 4481790], length 0
14:28:19.121392 IP 127.0.0.1.5000 > 127.0.0.1.5000: Flags [P.], seq
2005295208:2005295210, ack 2005295208, win 342, options [nop,nop,TS val 4482056
ecr 4481790], length 2
14:28:19.121407 IP 127.0.0.1.5000 > 127.0.0.1.5000: Flags [.], ack 2005295210,
win 342, options [nop,nop,TS val 4482056 ecr 4482056], length 0
# hping3 -S 127.0.0.1 -p 5000 -s 5000
HPING 127.0.0.1 (lo 127.0.0.1): S set, 40 headers + 0 data bytes
len=40 ip=127.0.0.1 ttl=64 id=2036 sport=5000 flags=S seq=0 win=512 rtt=3.8 ms
<< SYN
DUP! len=52 ip=127.0.0.1 ttl=64 DF id=670 sport=5000 flags=A seq=0 win=342
rtt=3.8 ms << SYN/ACK
len=40 ip=127.0.0.1 ttl=64 DF id=43435 sport=5000 flags=RA seq=1 win=0 rtt=3.7
ms
I confirmed it with nmap, nc, and hping3; granted they build on same c
libraries, so I am not even sure if this should be filed as a kernel bug (or
even a bug);
just did not expect to see this behavior //
Expected to see a RST instead.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2015-07-27 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-27 21:02 Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2015-07-27 21:35 ` Fw: [Bug 102051] New: Unexpected TCP behavior Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150727140218.095729a9@urahara \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox