From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
To: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: netns refcnt leak for kernel accept sock
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 20:50:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150727185002.GA20334@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHA+R7PzsOCR-UmJ+73jXJaacc_adz9F3-Qs4zB0cSFajpJREw@mail.gmail.com>
On (07/27/15 11:37), Cong Wang wrote:
>
> dlm uses a kernel TCP socket too, but it allocates a new socket and calls
> ->accept() by itself. ;)
sure, and rds does this in rds_tcp_accept_one() too.
But the newsk being created in sk_clone_lock is the one on an
incoming syn, i.e., the one that is saved up as part of listen backlog,
to be returned later on the accept.
I dont know the details of dlm- can you have one dlm instance per
network namespace? That's where I'm running into this issue- when we
try to have one rds listen socket per netns, and want to be able to
do both
- dynamically build/tear down new network namepsaces, without
unloading rds_tcp globally
- unload rds_tcp globally withouth tearing down individual netns.
But perhaps we digress.
Fundamental issue remains: newsk is the syn_recv version of the
listen socket. If the listen socket is a "kernel" socket (kern == 1
for sk_alloc, and the listen socket thus has no sk_net_refcnt),
the syn_recv socket must also have that behavior, so that it is
cleaned up in the same way.
--Sowmini
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-27 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-27 14:21 netns refcnt leak for kernel accept sock Sowmini Varadhan
2015-07-27 17:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-07-27 17:57 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-07-27 18:13 ` Cong Wang
2015-07-27 18:19 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-07-27 18:37 ` Cong Wang
2015-07-27 18:50 ` Sowmini Varadhan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150727185002.GA20334@oracle.com \
--to=sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com \
--cc=cwang@twopensource.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).