netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	open list: TI NETCP ETHERNET DRIVER <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Wingman Kwok <w-kwok2@ti.com>, ;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/15] drivers: net: Drop unlikely before IS_ERR(_OR_NULL)
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 21:50:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150731162018.GD899@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55BB8E7B.7050307@ti.com>

On 31-07-15, 11:04, Murali Karicheri wrote:
> On 07/31/2015 04:38 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >IS_ERR(_OR_NULL) already contain an 'unlikely' compiler flag and there
> >is no need to do that again from its callers. Drop it.
> >
> 
> IS_ERR_OR_NULL() is defined as
> 
> static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr)
> {
>         return !ptr || IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)ptr);
> }
> 
> So the unlikely() applies only to second part. Wouldn't that be a
> problem for optimization?

This is what the first patch of the series does:

http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2009151

-- 
viresh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-31 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1438331416.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2015-07-31  8:38 ` [PATCH 08/15] drivers: net: Drop unlikely before IS_ERR(_OR_NULL) Viresh Kumar
2015-07-31 15:04   ` Murali Karicheri
2015-07-31 15:39     ` David Laight
2015-07-31 16:20     ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-08-03 15:52       ` Murali Karicheri
     [not found] ` <cover.1438331416.git.viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-31  8:38   ` [PATCH 15/15] " Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150731162018.GD899@linux \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=w-kwok2@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).