From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: pktgen: don't abuse current->state in pktgen_thread_worker() Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:08:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20150804170827.GA1264@redhat.com> References: <20150804163334.GA31842@redhat.com> <20150804164056.GA2758@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "David S. Miller" , Huang Ying , Alexei Starovoitov , Jan Stancek , Jesper Brouer , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150804164056.GA2758@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 08/04, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 06:33:34PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Commit 1fbe4b46caca "net: pktgen: kill the Wait for kthread_stop > > code in pktgen_thread_worker()" removed (in particular) the final > > __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING) and I didn't notice the previous > > set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE). This triggers the warning > > in __might_sleep() after return. > > > > Afaics, we can simply remove both set_current_state()'s, and we > > could do this a long ago right after ef87979c273a2 "pktgen: better > > scheduler friendliness" which changed pktgen_thread_worker() to > > use wait_event_interruptible_timeout(). > > > > Reported-by: Huang Ying > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov > > Interesting that it didn't happen in my tests yet per description it > should have. Huang, did you do anything special to trigger this? Do you have CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y ? Oleg.