From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] bnx2x, cnic, bnx2fc: add support for BD Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 21:54:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20150806.215429.1576532174279680769.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1438670250-20130-1-git-send-email-Yuval.Mintz@qlogic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, James.bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org, chad.dupuis@qlogic.com, Ariel.Elior@qlogic.com To: Yuval.Mintz@qlogic.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:45517 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752114AbbHGEya (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2015 00:54:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1438670250-20130-1-git-send-email-Yuval.Mintz@qlogic.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Yuval Mintz Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:37:26 +0300 > Commit 230d00eb4bfe ("bnx2x: new Multi-function mode - BD") added support > for a new multi-function mode, but it added only the support required by > bnx2x for L2 interfaces. > > This adds the required changes to support the new multi-function mode in > the offloaded storage protocols. > > Dave, > > Please consider applying this series to `net-next'. > > Do notice that this involves non-networking driver changes - > but sending this as a single series seemed like the best approach as > we had to have bnx2x changes to support the new functionality. > If this is problematic, please tell us what's the preferred solution here. Series applied, thanks.