Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: kernel test robot <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: lkp@01.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lkp] [rhashtable] 9d901bc0515: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:63 __ioremap_check_ram+0x6a/0x99()
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 14:42:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150821064207.GA5835@gondor.apana.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fv3dkwgw.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 02:05:19PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> commit 9d901bc05153bbf33b5da2cd6266865e531f0545 ("rhashtable: Free bucket tables asynchronously after rehash")
> 
> With the commit, the possibility of OOM is increased under our boot testing.

Can you gather some stats on how much memory rhashtable is actually
using? With that kernel you've probably got only one rhashtable user
which is netlink.

Bear in mind that this is a fairly low-memory machine (< 300M) so
it's not clear to me that this patch is the root cause of your OOM
problem.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

       reply	other threads:[~2015-08-21  6:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <87fv3dkwgw.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
2015-08-21  6:42 ` Herbert Xu [this message]
2015-08-21  7:09   ` [lkp] [rhashtable] 9d901bc0515: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:63 __ioremap_check_ram+0x6a/0x99() Huang Ying
2015-08-21  7:22     ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150821064207.GA5835@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --to=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@01.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox