From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Christopher S. Hall" <christopher.s.hall@intel.com>,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
john.stultz@linaro.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] Add support for driver cross-timestamp to PTP_SYS_OFFSET ioctl
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 23:17:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150822211718.GA8561@netboy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1508222226540.3873@nanos>
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 10:33:48PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > @@ -196,19 +197,31 @@ long ptp_ioctl(struct posix_clock *pc, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > break;
> > }
> > pct = &sysoff->ts[0];
> > - for (i = 0; i < sysoff->n_samples; i++) {
> > - getnstimeofday64(&ts);
> > + if (ptp->info->getsynctime64 && sysoff->n_samples == 1 &&
>
> The number of samples should be irrelevant for this sampling method.
Chris had send me a preview of this before he posted, so I can explain
that test for one sample.
User space requests N (1 to 25) samples of the two clocks. The kernel
is supposed to deliver that many samples. This has always been the
documented behavior. From ptp_clock.h:
struct ptp_sys_offset {
unsigned int n_samples; /* Desired number of measurements. */
unsigned int rsv[3]; /* Reserved for future use. */
/*
* Array of interleaved system/phc time stamps. The kernel
* will provide 2*n_samples + 1 time stamps, with the last
* one as a system time stamp.
*/
struct ptp_clock_time ts[2 * PTP_MAX_SAMPLES + 1];
};
So the kernel cannot simply change n_samples to 1.
I would prefer to have a new system call that compares any two posix
clock_t, but that is of course more work.
Allowing n_samples=1 as a special case is a kind of overloading of the
ioctl to support the new capability. At least it preserves the
behavior of the interface from the user's perspective.
Thanks,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-22 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-21 18:52 [PATCH v3 0/4] Patchset enabling hardware based cross-timestamps for next gen Intel platforms Christopher S. Hall
2015-08-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Add correlated clocksource deriving system time from an auxiliary clocksource Christopher S. Hall
2015-08-22 20:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-03 23:20 ` Hall, Christopher S
2015-09-04 8:11 ` Richard Cochran
2015-09-04 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-04 21:12 ` Hall, Christopher S
2015-09-04 13:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-04 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-04 15:17 ` Richard Cochran
2015-09-04 15:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-04 16:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-04 21:01 ` Hall, Christopher S
2015-09-05 8:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-05 10:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-04 15:32 ` Richard Cochran
2015-09-04 21:50 ` John Stultz
2015-08-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] Added ART correlated clocksource and ART CPU feature Christopher S. Hall
2015-08-22 20:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] Add support for driver cross-timestamp to PTP_SYS_OFFSET ioctl Christopher S. Hall
2015-08-22 20:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-22 21:17 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2015-08-23 8:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-23 11:25 ` Richard Cochran
2015-08-24 20:16 ` Hall, Christopher S
2015-08-25 7:31 ` Richard Cochran
2015-08-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] Enabling hardware supported PTP system/device crosstimestamping Christopher S. Hall
2015-08-22 20:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150822211718.GA8561@netboy \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=christopher.s.hall@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).