From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [patch net-next 2/3] mlxsw: expose EMAD transactions statistics via debugfs Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:26:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20150826.172627.1308479737177053945.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20150826073757.GB2215@nanopsycho.orion> <20150826.104906.9246591425074015.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, netdev@vger.kernel.org, idosch@mellanox.com, eladr@mellanox.com, ogerlitz@mellanox.com, jiri@mellanox.com To: sfeldma@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:38942 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751801AbbH0A0a (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:26:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Scott Feldman Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:21:59 -0700 > Using another netdev doesn't seem right. Do we need a new device > class for switches, and then create some common tool/interfaces for > switch device class? This is probably what we will need to do. There has also been a discussion lately about making light weight netdev objects, of which these new switch things can be a super-class of.