From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: tgraf@suug.ch, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
wfg@linux.intel.com, lkp@01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rhashtable-test: retry insert operations in threads
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:00:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150831110012.GO20760@orbit.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150830074717.GA25396@gondor.apana.org.au>
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 03:47:17PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> wrote:
> >
> > Should we introduce a new field to struct rhashtable to track the
> > internal state? This might allow to clean up some rather obscure tests,
> > e.g. whether a table resize is in progress or not.
>
> Why would we want to do that? The deferred expansion is done
> on a best effort basis so its failure has nothing to do with
> the failure of a subsequent insertion.
The variable would be used to track if the worker has failed to allocate
memory in background.
Since the failing insertion will be retried, subsequent inserts are not
necessary unrelated.
> The insertion must have tried its own last-ditch synchronous
> expansion and only fail if that fails.
Who do you mean with "the insertion"? The user or the API?
Cheers, Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-31 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-28 10:28 [PATCH 1/3] rhashtable-test: add cond_resched() to thread test Phil Sutter
2015-08-28 10:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] rhashtable-test: retry insert operations in threads Phil Sutter
2015-08-28 11:09 ` Thomas Graf
2015-08-28 11:13 ` Phil Sutter
2015-08-28 13:34 ` Phil Sutter
2015-08-28 22:43 ` Thomas Graf
2015-08-29 9:07 ` Phil Sutter
2015-08-30 7:47 ` Herbert Xu
2015-08-31 11:00 ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2015-09-01 11:43 ` Herbert Xu
2015-09-01 12:46 ` Phil Sutter
2015-09-01 13:00 ` Herbert Xu
2015-09-01 13:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-09-01 13:43 ` Phil Sutter
2015-09-01 13:50 ` Herbert Xu
2015-09-01 13:56 ` Phil Sutter
2015-09-01 14:03 ` Herbert Xu
2015-09-01 14:13 ` Thomas Graf
2015-09-01 14:16 ` Herbert Xu
2015-09-01 14:51 ` Thomas Graf
2015-09-02 2:00 ` Herbert Xu
2015-09-02 7:07 ` Thomas Graf
2015-09-10 8:03 ` Herbert Xu
2015-09-10 10:05 ` Phil Sutter
2015-08-28 10:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] rhashtable-test: calculate max_entries value by default Phil Sutter
2015-08-28 11:11 ` Thomas Graf
2015-08-28 11:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] rhashtable-test: add cond_resched() to thread test Thomas Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150831110012.GO20760@orbit.nwl.cc \
--to=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=wfg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).