From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tycho Andersen Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ebpf: allow BPF_REG_X in src_reg conditional jumps Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 16:43:50 -0600 Message-ID: <20150904224350.GU26679@smitten> References: <1441382664-17437-1-git-send-email-tycho.andersen@canonical.com> <1441382664-17437-7-git-send-email-tycho.andersen@canonical.com> <20150904210619.GF1842@Alexeis-MacBook-Pro-2.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Kees Cook , Alexei Starovoitov , Will Drewry , Oleg Nesterov , Andy Lutomirski , Pavel Emelyanov , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Daniel Borkmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Alexei Starovoitov Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150904210619.GF1842@Alexeis-MacBook-Pro-2.local> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Alexei, On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:06:19PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 10:04:24AM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote: > > The classic converter generates conditional jumps with: > > > > if (BPF_SRC(fp->code) == BPF_K && (int) fp->k < 0) { > > ... > > } else { > > insn->dst_reg = BPF_REG_A; > > insn->src_reg = BPF_REG_X; > > insn->imm = fp->k; > > bpf_src = BPF_SRC(fp->code); > > } > > > > but here, we enforce that the src_reg == BPF_REG_0. We should also allow > > BPF_REG_X since that's what the converter generates; this enables us to > > load eBPF programs that were generated by the converter. > > good catch. classic->extended converter is just being untidy. > It shouldn't be populating unused 'src_reg' field when BPF_SRC == BPF_K > verifier is doing the right thing. It's rejecting instructions that > have junk in unused fields to make sure that someday we can extend it > with something useful. > The fix should be something like this: > diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c > index 13079f03902e..05a04ea87172 100644 > --- a/net/core/filter.c > +++ b/net/core/filter.c > @@ -478,9 +478,9 @@ do_pass: > bpf_src = BPF_X; > } else { > insn->dst_reg = BPF_REG_A; > - insn->src_reg = BPF_REG_X; > insn->imm = fp->k; > bpf_src = BPF_SRC(fp->code); > + insn->src_reg = bpf_src == BPF_X ? BPF_REG_X : 0; > } Yep, I just tested this and it works for me. Do you want to manage it or should I carry it as part of this set? Tycho