From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
To: Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
ebiederm@xmission.com, davem@davemloft.net, simon@farnz.org.uk,
develop@kristov.de
Subject: Re: 4.1.0, kernel panic, pppoe_release
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:56:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150910155657.GC3661@alphalink.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de4b28603ef7bcaea7aeca73dab80079@visp.net.lb>
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:16:14PM +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> Probably my knowledge of kernel is not sufficient, but i will try few
> approaches.
> One of them to add to pppoe_unbind_sock_work:
>
> pppox_unbind_sock(sk);
> +/* Signal the death of the socket. */
> +sk->sk_state = PPPOX_DEAD;
>
I don't believe this will fix anything. pppox_unbind_sock() already
sets sk->sk_state when necessary.
> I will wait first, to make sure this patch was causing kernel panic (it
> needs 24h testing cycle), then i will try this fix.
>
I suspect the problem goes with actions performed on the underlying
interface (MAC address, MTU or link state update). This triggers
pppoe_flush_dev(), which cleans up the device without announcing it
in sk->sk_state.
Can you pleas try the following patch?
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
index 3837ae3..2ed7506 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
@@ -313,7 +313,6 @@ static void pppoe_flush_dev(struct net_device *dev)
if (po->pppoe_dev == dev &&
sk->sk_state & (PPPOX_CONNECTED | PPPOX_BOUND | PPPOX_ZOMBIE)) {
pppox_unbind_sock(sk);
- sk->sk_state = PPPOX_ZOMBIE;
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
po->pppoe_dev = NULL;
dev_put(dev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-10 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-14 10:57 4.1.0, kernel panic, pppoe_release Denys Fedoryshchenko
2015-07-17 9:24 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2015-07-17 15:36 ` Dan Williams
2015-07-17 18:16 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2015-09-10 15:56 ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
2015-09-22 1:47 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2015-09-25 14:38 ` Guillaume Nault
2015-09-25 15:02 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2015-09-25 19:02 ` Guillaume Nault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150910155657.GC3661@alphalink.fr \
--to=g.nault@alphalink.fr \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=develop@kristov.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com \
--cc=simon@farnz.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).