From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sowmini Varadhan Subject: Re: IFLA_INET6_[ICMP6]STATS Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:16:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20150910171630.GP20544@oracle.com> References: <20150909214528.GE20544@oracle.com> <55F1A53E.1010908@cumulusnetworks.com> <20150910154819.GL20544@oracle.com> <20150910.101303.1945782677465930122.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:38748 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751981AbbIJRRR (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:17:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150910.101303.1945782677465930122.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On (09/10/15 10:13), David Miller wrote: > I don't think using such a generic netlink flag works best, the > IFLA_EXT_MASK is definitely more suitable. Ok, though this more of a IFLA_TRUNCATE_MASK than a IFLA_EXT_MASK.