From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net: irda: pxaficp_ir: use sched_clock() for time management Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:40:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20150915.164025.1543038793305792029.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1442058324-9760-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: samuel@sortiz.org, petr.cvek@tul.cz, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de To: robert.jarzmik@free.fr Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1442058324-9760-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:45:22 +0200 > Instead of using directly the OS timer through direct register access, > use the standard sched_clock(), which will end up in OSCR reading > anyway. > > This is a first step for direct access register removal and machine > specific code removal from this driver. > > Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik What is the granularity of the OSCR register? If it is not nanoseconds, then you need to adjust calculations such as this one: > @@ -549,7 +548,7 @@ static int pxa_irda_hard_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) > skb_copy_from_linear_data(skb, si->dma_tx_buff, skb->len); > > if (mtt) > - while ((unsigned)(readl_relaxed(OSCR) - si->last_oscr)/4 < mtt) > + while ((sched_clock() - si->last_clk) / 4 < mtt) > cpu_relax();