From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: smc91x: convert pxa dma to dmaengine Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:37:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20150917.133722.634502765225590262.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1441913164-3785-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <20150915.162414.1153837609419205002.davem@davemloft.net> <87a8smsntp.fsf@belgarion.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk, nico@fluxnic.net, arnd@arndb.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: robert.jarzmik@free.fr Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87a8smsntp.fsf@belgarion.home> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Robert Jarzmik Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:41:54 +0200 > David Miller writes: > >> From: Robert Jarzmik >> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 21:26:04 +0200 >> >>> Convert the dma transfers to be dmaengine based, now pxa has a dmaengine >>> slave driver. This makes this driver a bit more PXA agnostic. >>> >>> The driver was tested on pxa27x (mainstone) and pxa310 (zylonite), >>> ie. only pxa platforms. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik >>> Cc: Russell King >>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann >>> --- >>> This has potential to break other platform such as Neponset, Idp, >>> halibut and qsd8x50, so I added Russell and Arnd as they were discussing >>> smc91x support last February. >> > >> Is someone testing whether such platforms break or not? I'm waiting for >> that before I consider applying this patch. > > My understanding is that Russell is the only one left testing them, or at least > he was the only one complaining about a breakage lately on neponset. > > I can wait several weeks for Russell to have a bit of time to try : I know it > will compile correctly at least for neponset, and I know almost all the code is > under #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_PXA. And still I would feel far more comfortable if it > was tested, just as you. Oh well, I've waited long enough.... patch applied, thanks.