netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ncardwell@google.com, ycheng@google.com,
	jri@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp_cubic: do not set epoch_start in the future
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 22:35:35 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150917.223535.157337200633800999.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442504280.16225.15.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:38:00 -0700

> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> 
> Tracking idle time in bictcp_cwnd_event() is imprecise, as epoch_start
> is normally set at ACK processing time, not at send time.
> 
> Doing a proper fix would need to add an additional state variable,
> and does not seem worth the trouble, given CUBIC bug has been there
> forever before Jana noticed it.
> 
> Let's simply not set epoch_start in the future, otherwise
> bictcp_update() could overflow and CUBIC would again
> grow cwnd too fast.
> 
> This was detected thanks to a packetdrill test Neal wrote that was flaky
> before applying this fix.
> 
> Fixes: 30927520dbae ("tcp_cubic: better follow cubic curve after idle period")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
> Cc: Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>

Applied, thanks.

      reply	other threads:[~2015-09-18  5:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-17 15:38 [PATCH net] tcp_cubic: do not set epoch_start in the future Eric Dumazet
2015-09-18  5:35 ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150917.223535.157337200633800999.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jri@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).