From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?U8O2cmVu?= Brinkmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Phy and mdiobus fixes Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 08:01:28 -0700 Message-ID: <20150918150128.GV2722@xsjsorenbubuntu> References: <20150918094625.GB21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150918095600.GC21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Florian Fainelli , Thomas Petazzoni , , "Sunil Goutham" , Robert Richter , Frank Rowand , , , Rob Herring , "Michal Simek" , , "Iyappan Subramanian" , Grant Likely , Li Yang , Keyur Chudgar , To: Russell King - ARM Linux Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150918095600.GC21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Russell, On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 10:56AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Sorry guys, some of you will get the patches twice, as S=C3=B6ren's n= ame > in the header caused vger to reject all the patches. That is the first time I hear about an issue like that. I've been receiving patches fine thus far and nobody reported any rejections (by vger) to me. Is it some bounce on Xilinx/my side or is vger suddenly rejecting non-ascii chars or is something in the mail processing chain not properly encoding those chars? Please, let me know if I can help with the problem. Thanks, S=C3=B6ren