From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netlink: Replace rhash_portid with bound Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 23:43:21 -0400 Message-ID: <20150924034321.GD26853@htj.duckdns.org> References: <20150923155440.GB26647@mtj.duckdns.org> <20150924023010.GA27131@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150924024608.GA25502@htj.duckdns.org> <20150924025435.GB27355@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150924030609.GA26853@htj.duckdns.org> <20150924032100.GA27649@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150924032928.GB26853@htj.duckdns.org> <20150924033117.GA27754@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150924034116.GC26853@htj.duckdns.org> <20150924034214.GA27843@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , cwang@twopensource.com, tom@herbertland.com, kafai@fb.com, kernel-team@fb.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, jiri@resnulli.us, nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, tgraf@suug.ch, sfeldma@gmail.com To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150924034214.GA27843@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:42:14AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > Well I disagree so let's leave it at that. Leaving things disagreed is fine but there's still a patch to commit here, so I get that you're still dead against just applying the pattern? -- tejun