From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] lwtunnel: make it really work, for IPv4
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:35:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150924103511.6fe80b6b@griffin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878u7w6dxh.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:09:14 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> *Blink* You were targeting net.git with a feature enhancement????
> I will just ignore that.
I do not. This is set is a minimal fix to make IP based lwtunnels with
tunnel information specified in a route working (for IPv4, anyway).
Note that lwtunnels and IP/UDP based lwtunnels is a new feature merged
for 4.3. This set fixes a flaw in that feature.
Eric, I'd like you to ask how do you propose to fix this problem in
net.git. So far, your proposals were:
1. Use a new ndo to "reverse" metadata dst. I can do that but all
current users will just call iptunnel_metadata_reply. Seems to be
superfluous but whatever.
2. Replace metadata_dst on ingress with a combination of cb and
outer_*_header. This is certainly not suitable for net.git and won't
solve the problem anyway.
Meanwhile, I'm going to resubmit patch 2 as a separate fix, as this is
kind of urgent. Having non working feature in a released kernel is sad
but only a temporary problem. Having non working uAPI in a released
kernel is a problem we'll have to deal with forever.
Jiri
--
Jiri Benc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-24 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-22 16:12 [PATCH net 0/2] lwtunnel: make it really work, for IPv4 Jiri Benc
2015-09-22 16:12 ` [PATCH net 1/2] ipv4: send arp replies to the correct tunnel Jiri Benc
2015-09-23 8:10 ` Thomas Graf
2015-09-22 16:12 ` [PATCH net 2/2] lwtunnel: remove source and destination UDP port config option Jiri Benc
2015-09-23 8:12 ` Thomas Graf
2015-09-23 4:39 ` [PATCH net 0/2] lwtunnel: make it really work, for IPv4 Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-23 8:09 ` Thomas Graf
2015-09-23 12:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-23 14:29 ` Jiri Benc
2015-09-23 17:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-23 20:54 ` Jiri Benc
2015-09-23 21:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-23 23:08 ` Thomas Graf
2015-09-24 5:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-24 8:19 ` Jiri Benc
2015-09-24 8:35 ` Jiri Benc [this message]
2015-09-23 8:08 ` Thomas Graf
2015-09-24 21:32 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150924103511.6fe80b6b@griffin \
--to=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).