From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [MM PATCH V4 5/6] slub: support for bulk free with SLUB freelists
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 20:16:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150929201605.18626b1b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <560AC854.6040601@gmail.com>
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:20:20 -0700
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/29/2015 10:00 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:38:30 -0700
> > Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 09/29/2015 08:48 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_KMEMCHECK) || \
> >>> + defined(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) || \
> >>> + defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK) || \
> >>> + defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_FREE) || \
> >>> + defined(CONFIG_KASAN)
> >>> +static inline void slab_free_freelist_hook(struct kmem_cache *s,
> >>> + void *head, void *tail)
> >>> +{
> >>> + void *object = head;
> >>> + void *tail_obj = tail ? : head;
> >>> +
> >>> + do {
> >>> + slab_free_hook(s, object);
> >>> + } while ((object != tail_obj) &&
> >>> + (object = get_freepointer(s, object)));
> >>> +}
> >>> +#else
> >>> +static inline void slab_free_freelist_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj_tail,
> >>> + void *freelist_head) {}
> >>> +#endif
> >>> +
> >> Instead of messing around with an #else you might just wrap the contents
> >> of slab_free_freelist_hook in the #if/#endif instead of the entire
> >> function declaration.
> >
> > I had it that way in an earlier version of the patch, but I liked
> > better this way.
>
> It would be nice if the argument names were the same for both cases.
> Having the names differ will make it more difficult to maintain when
> changes need to be made to the function.
Nice spotted, I forgot to change arg names of the empty function, when
I updated the patch. Guess, it is an argument for moving the "if
defined()" into the function body.
It just looked strange to have such a big ifdef block inside the
function. I also earlier had it define another def and use that inside
the function, but then the code-reader would not know if this new def
was/could-be used later (nitpicking alert...)
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-29 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-28 12:26 [PATCH 0/7] Further optimizing SLAB/SLUB bulking Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] slub: create new ___slab_alloc function that can be called with irqs disabled Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 2/7] slub: Avoid irqoff/on in bulk allocation Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] slub: mark the dangling ifdef #else of CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-28 13:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-09-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] slab: implement bulking for SLAB allocator Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-28 15:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-09-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] slub: support for bulk free with SLUB freelists Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-28 15:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-09-28 15:51 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-28 16:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-09-29 7:32 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-28 16:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-09-29 7:12 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] slub: optimize bulk slowpath free by detached freelist Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-28 15:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-09-28 12:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] slub: do prefetching in kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-28 14:53 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-09-28 15:59 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-29 15:46 ` [MM PATCH V4 0/6] Further optimizing SLAB/SLUB bulking Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-29 15:47 ` [MM PATCH V4 1/6] slub: create new ___slab_alloc function that can be called with irqs disabled Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-29 15:47 ` [MM PATCH V4 2/6] slub: Avoid irqoff/on in bulk allocation Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-29 15:47 ` [MM PATCH V4 3/6] slub: mark the dangling ifdef #else of CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-29 15:48 ` [MM PATCH V4 4/6] slab: implement bulking for SLAB allocator Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-29 15:48 ` [MM PATCH V4 5/6] slub: support for bulk free with SLUB freelists Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-29 16:38 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-09-29 17:00 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-29 17:20 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-09-29 18:16 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2015-09-30 11:44 ` [MM PATCH V4.1 " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-30 16:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-01 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2015-10-02 9:41 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-10-02 10:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-02 10:40 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-10-02 13:40 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-10-02 21:50 ` Andrew Morton
2015-10-05 19:26 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-10-05 21:20 ` Andi Kleen
2015-10-05 23:07 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-10-07 12:31 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-10-07 13:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-10-07 15:44 ` Andi Kleen
2015-10-07 16:06 ` Andi Kleen
2015-10-05 23:53 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-10-07 10:39 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-09-29 15:48 ` [MM PATCH V4 6/6] slub: optimize bulk slowpath free by detached freelist Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-10-14 5:15 ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-10-21 7:57 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-11-05 5:09 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150929201605.18626b1b@redhat.com \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).