From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: HW communication debugging interface - ideas? Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 11:56:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20151005095633.GE2278@nanopsycho.orion> References: <20150930135141.GF2098@nanopsycho.orion> <9B0331B6EBBD0E4684FBFAEDA55776F91944E43E@HASMSX110.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "eladr@mellanox.com" , "idosch@mellanox.com" To: "Rosen, Rami" Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:33545 "EHLO mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752106AbbJEJ4f (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2015 05:56:35 -0400 Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so111978439wic.0 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 02:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9B0331B6EBBD0E4684FBFAEDA55776F91944E43E@HASMSX110.ger.corp.intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 11:54:38AM CEST, rami.rosen@intel.com wrote: >Hi, Jiri, > >>In our case, we put message into skb and ... > >Just to be sure we are on the same page: > >By "In our case" - I assume you are referring to the mlxsw Ethernet switch driver, right ? Yes. > >>we put message into skb and push that out as an ordinary packet. >HW then > sends us reply in a packet, similar to other rx-ed packets. > >Are you referring here to messages of the EMAD protocol ? Yes. > >Rami Rosen >Intel Corporation >-- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html