From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: HW communication debugging interface - ideas? Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:58:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20151005145842.GD8673@lunn.ch> References: <20150930135141.GF2098@nanopsycho.orion> <9B0331B6EBBD0E4684FBFAEDA55776F91944E43E@HASMSX110.ger.corp.intel.com> <20151005095633.GE2278@nanopsycho.orion> <20151005144941.GC8673@lunn.ch> <20151005145542.GJ2278@nanopsycho.orion> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Rosen, Rami" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "eladr@mellanox.com" , "idosch@mellanox.com" To: Jiri Pirko Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:35801 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751347AbbJEO6p (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2015 10:58:45 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151005145542.GJ2278@nanopsycho.orion> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 04:55:42PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 04:49:41PM CEST, andrew@lunn.ch wrote: > >> >Are you referring here to messages of the EMAD protocol ? > > > >I know nothing about this protocol..... > > > >Does it at least use standard Ethernet framing? Source and Destination > >header and an EtherType which mean EMAD? > > Yep, but that does not really matter. I believe we should find debugging > interface which is protocol agnostic. Just arbitrary messages > monitoring. Hi Jiri O.K, it is just that you mentioned wireshark. Passing the frames to network interface taps would make this trivial. Andrew